Comments on: Fashion meets Bridals

By: Ffoto framkallning

Ffoto framkallning — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:51:44 +0000

Hi, that was definitely an awesome read. I had actually been searching for a photo printing related article for a while now. Great! I have a similar blog, how much do you charge for advertising? because I can’t seem to find the information anywhere.

By: annfrendly

annfrendly — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:30:36 +0000

wow…
beautiful…
so nice.
very good job.

hey phoenix…
i don’t think he did weired stuff…
it’s about art…

By: PhoeNix

PhoeNix — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:36:31 +0000

You do some weird stuff…

By: Jake Garn

Jake Garn — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:51:29 +0000

@John Stacy
I use Adobe Lightroom mainly as a RAW image processor, Photoshop cannot process RAW images except through Adobe Camera Raw (ACR), which does a lot of the things Lightroom does but I find Lightroom to be just a bit more powerful as they usually introduce new features into Lightroom first before introducing them to ACR. Basically I do all my macro adjustments (things that affect the entire image) in Lightroom and I do all my spot adjustments, layer masks, montages, backgrounds, healing, dodging & burning etc. in Photoshop. Lightroom is mainly meant to be a powerful batch processor and it performs amazingly in that respect as well. For a couple hundred bucks it’s well worth it to me.

Both Lightroom and Photoshop are a part of my workflow on almost every image.

By: John Stacy

John Stacy — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:28:21 +0000

Hello!! I had to chuckle at your comment, “No Photoshop(c) used…”, only Lightroom(c). Lightroom’s(c) “official” name is, “Adobe(c) Photoshop(c) Lightroom(c) v.x”, so technically….

But seriously, a quick question to a user experienced with Lightroom(c)…What are the benefits/differences of Lightroom(c) over Photoshop(c)?? Adobe’s(c) PR fluff doesn’t give me a good excuse to go with Lightroom(c).

GREAT bridal shots by the way!!!!

John