5 faces

Five

Faces

Do multiple faces mean automatic super-villain status?


I+II+III+IV+V

I am nothing if not a mad scientist, had I any talents in biology or any sort of life sciences I would be the guy in a lab that accidentally created a super hero/villain out of myself and at this moment a blockbuster movie would be in production about my life. It would be a massive success and I would be stumbling out of the car with Paris Hilton as we speak… and my wife would be pissed but she’d understand because I wasn’t myself, it was the mad science that made me freak out.

Alas, I have no biology skills whatsoever… but that doesn’t mean I can’t mess around in a digital lab.

Earlier today I thought to myself, what if I took five beautiful women and combined them into one face.  Would the resulting image be some sort of super-villain or simply an ode to the simple beauty that exists in every face, in every girl, in every country of the world.  You be the judge.

5-faces1

Bookmark and Share

25 Responses to “5 faces”

  1. Gabs says:

    :-)
    Athur Batut was the man who invented the firsts “portrait type”. The technique was a morphing from a whole family’s faces (or a village) to look if the “new” portrait was a “type” from the whole group.
    Have a look at this : http://www.espacebatut.fr/
    I’m working near this museum ;-)

  2. interesting! i would like to see another example (:

  3. Jake Garn says:

    Gabs,
    Thanks for that great link!

  4. miss molly says:

    i cant stop staring!

  5. Fascinating how the new image has an angelic & pure quality about it.

    @Gabs – Cool link on Arthur Batut. He did that without Photoshop!

  6. Ladyblue says:

    Very interesting! Great job JG:-).It`s just amazing how you can manipulate 5 photos into one! Your work is exellent,everything!:-)

  7. Steve says:

    Well that’s what I like to call “Super Cool!”

  8. keb says:

    I’ve found with this, is that there is a certain face that may be “stronger” than the others and even though mixed with others is still predominant. The lower half is predominantly #5 and the top half still has a lot of her there.

    But it is a new face nonetheless. Try squinting, it makes it even more powerful.

  9. Rebecca says:

    It does seem to me that the compilation image is more surreally perfect “beautiful” than any one individual model’s photo. It would be interesting to make a sci-fi film using a heroine character that is an amalgamated video of multiple beautiful females. I’d love to see some more.

  10. Ed says:

    wow, I certainly agree with sterling tht it has an angelic look, did u change the layer modes or just the opacity? if u went for the layer modes I’dve imagined it would have been more abstract? good work. thanks for the blog.
    xx

    • Jake Garn says:

      Ed,
      To get all 5 images to be equally (or at least nearly equally) represented I had to incorporate a couple methods including a different opacity for each layer as well as some tinkering with a layer mode or two.

  11. Ilan says:

    That’s long way for super-villain.. Unless by villain you mean pure beauty.
    Great idea to try, I have a friend that for his masters did the same thing but with about 3000 people – He tried to find the average face.
    I must say that your five look WAY better :)

  12. Steven Rose says:

    You’re not the first one to wonder about this…check out Face Research – http://www.faceresearch.org/demos/average

  13. Ships says:

    It is quite interesting. I never thought about this and the examples are pretty right.

  14. KrisBelucci says:

    da best. Keep it going! Thank you

  15. Average says:

    Try averaging these faces

    http://bit.ly/BwT2V

  16. Leslie says:

    I can’t find the video tutorial you posted a while back about how to fake an HDR image. Repost?

    Thanks! I love your work!

  17. Striking photos! So professionally done! Beautiful and expressive!

  18. Andreas says:

    I recently followed a TV report about a piece of experimental software that is capable of judging ‘beauty’ like humans do. I suppose that PortraitProfessional uses similar algorithms to sculpture faces.

    Anyway, I don’t think that your ‘creature’ is the sum of the five models – and that’s good. Phew! Then, however, I followed the link that Steven posted and fell in love with my result. :D


Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. 5 faces says:

    [...] Original post by Whimsical Fashion Photography [...]

  2. iPhoto | Digital Definition for Photographers…

    iPhoto.org is launched! Free web photo album online for my photos sharing. Tutorials of light and large format photography on the net….

  3. [...] bookmarks tagged mad 5 faces saved by 3 others     petstakeover bookmarked on 04/21/09 | [...]

  4. [...] Here is the original: 5 faces | Whimsical Fashion Photography [...]

Leave a Reply